[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110509110329.GF4122@quack.suse.cz>
Date: Mon, 9 May 2011 13:03:29 +0200
From: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
To: Allison Henderson <achender@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Ext4 Developers List <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>,
Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] Null Pointer when make_indexed_dir returns -ENOSPC
On Sat 07-05-11 16:54:27, Allison Henderson wrote:
> Fix for a null pointer bug found while running punch hole tests
>
> Signed-off-by: Allison Henderson <achender@...ibm.com>
> ---
> :100644 100644 3c7a06e... 3302a6c... M fs/ext4/namei.c
> fs/ext4/namei.c | 3 ++-
> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/namei.c b/fs/ext4/namei.c
> index 3c7a06e..3302a6c 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/namei.c
> +++ b/fs/ext4/namei.c
> @@ -1422,7 +1422,8 @@ static int make_indexed_dir(handle_t *handle, struct dentry *dentry,
> */
> ext4_mark_inode_dirty(handle, dir);
> ext4_handle_dirty_metadata(handle, dir, frame->bh);
> - ext4_handle_dirty_metadata(handle, dir, bh);
> + if (bh)
> + ext4_handle_dirty_metadata(handle, dir, bh);
I'm puzzled - bh here is bh2 from the beginning of the function and we
check it for being NULL after we ext4_append() it. So how can this happen?
Honza
> dx_release(frames);
> return retval;
> }
> --
> 1.7.1
>
--
Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
SUSE Labs, CR
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists