[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110509124322.GB306@bitwizard.nl>
Date: Mon, 9 May 2011 14:43:22 +0200
From: Rogier Wolff <R.E.Wolff@...Wizard.nl>
To: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Cc: Christoph Anton Mitterer <calestyo@...entia.net>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
adilger@...ger.ca, amir73il@...rs.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: mounting ext3 with another superblock doesn't work?
On Mon, May 09, 2011 at 02:06:08PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
> > e2fsprogs' mkfs is really missing a check whether any known
> > filesystem/partition type/container (luks, lvm, mdadm, etc.) is already on
> > device (and a -force switch),... IIRC xfsprogs already do this more or
> > less.
> Yes, that would be reasonable although it might break some
> people's scripts. But probably worth it anyway.
This is a difficult change....
Some GUI install things already perform this check and after asking
confirmation from the user will just execute:
mkfs.ext3 /dev/....
and expect it to make the filesystem.
So you could add an option:
--check _for_existing_filesystem
But then it is quite likely that people running it manually will
forget to add the option....
Roger.
--
** R.E.Wolff@...Wizard.nl ** http://www.BitWizard.nl/ ** +31-15-2600998 **
** Delftechpark 26 2628 XH Delft, The Netherlands. KVK: 27239233 **
*-- BitWizard writes Linux device drivers for any device you may have! --*
Q: It doesn't work. A: Look buddy, doesn't work is an ambiguous statement.
Does it sit on the couch all day? Is it unemployed? Please be specific!
Define 'it' and what it isn't doing. --------- Adapted from lxrbot FAQ
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists