linux-ext4 - Re: [PATCH 1/1] Null Pointer when make_indexed

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20110509135516.GJ4138@thunk.org>
Date:	Mon, 9 May 2011 09:55:16 -0400
From:	Ted Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
To:	Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Cc:	Yongqiang Yang <xiaoqiangnk@...il.com>,
	Allison Henderson <achender@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Ext4 Developers List <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] Null Pointer when make_indexed_dir returns -ENOSPC

On Mon, May 09, 2011 at 01:30:52PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
> Ah, I see. But then you just reintroduced the bug I was trying to fix. So
> either do_split() has to do the marking of buffer dirty, or we have to do
> it before calllig do_split(), or do_split() has to be changed and not
> release passed buffer (and the two callers have to do it - which they seem
> to do anyway). I don't mind either way but your fix is wrong.

I think it's OK.  We do call ext4_handle_dirty_metadata on frame->bh,
which deals with the original version of bh.  And the cases where
do_split() sets bh to NULL is either (a) a journal error, in which
case we will have already aborted the journal, or an I/O error while
reading in the block, so bh won't have gotten modified yet.

Is there a case that you're worried about that I'm missing?

   	   	     	    	    	       - Ted
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html