[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110516155138.GI5344@quack.suse.cz>
Date: Mon, 16 May 2011 17:51:38 +0200
From: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
To: Manish Katiyar <mkatiyar@...il.com>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, ext4 <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>,
Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] jbd2: Pass extra bool parameter in journal
routines to specify if its ok to fail the journal transaction allocation.
Hello,
On Thu 12-05-11 23:37:05, Manish Katiyar wrote:
> On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 8:54 AM, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > sorry I got to your patches with a delay. One general note - please do
> > not attach patches. It is enough to have them in the email...
> >
> > On Sun 24-04-11 17:10:41, Manish Katiyar wrote:
> >> Pass extra bool parameter in journal routines to specify if its ok to
> >> fail the journal transaction allocation. If 'true' is passed
> >> transaction allocation is done through GFP_KERNEL and ENOMEM is
> >> returned else GFP_NOFS is used.
> > Please, do not mix error handling with gfp masks. Instead just rename
> > jbd2__journal_start() to jbd2_journal_start() and change gfp_mask parameter
> > to "bool errok".
>
> ok.
>
> > Use GFP_NOFS gfp mask for start_this_handle().
> I think I didn't completely understand this line. You meant passing
> GFP_KERNEL or GFP_NOFS based on errok right ?
No, I meant passing GFP_NOFS always. Currently, GFP_NOFS is used in all
the cases (noone uses GFP_KERNEL variant) and GFP_KERNEL can really be used
only when we do not hold other filesystem locks (as GFP_KERNEL allocation
can recurse back into filesystem to reclaim memory). So using GFP_KERNEL
would need more auditting and is a separate issue anyway.
> > Also your patch series should be bisectable - that means it must compile
> > and run after any of the patches. So you cannot really change
> > jbd2_journal_start() prototype without changing all the filesystems using
> > it. In this case, just include in this patch a simple change for ext4 and
> > ocfs2 to pass 'false' in the additional argument.
>
> ok.. Will submit the first patch as everyone passing false as the
> errok argument.
Thanks.
Honza
--
Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
SUSE Labs, CR
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists