[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110519014149.GA11278@noexit.corp.google.com>
Date: Wed, 18 May 2011 18:41:51 -0700
From: Joel Becker <jlbec@...lplan.org>
To: Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>
Cc: Allison Henderson <achender@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
xfs-oss <xfs@....sgi.com>,
Ext4 Developers List <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [XFS Tests Punch Hole 2/3 v3] XFS TESTS: Add Fallocate Punch
Hole Test Routines
On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 11:31:44AM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > +#
> > +# This test is successful when the following conditions are met:
> > +# - ls shows that the number of blocks occupied by the file
> > +# has decreased by the number of blocks punched out.
>
> There's no guarantee that a filesystem will punch the number of
> blocks you expect.
Cluster allocated filesystems like ocfs2 are certainly going to
punch some multiple of clusters, not exact blocks. Eg if the hole is
punched in the middle of a cluster.
Joel
--
Life's Little Instruction Book #464
"Don't miss the magic of the moment by focusing on what's
to come."
http://www.jlbec.org/
jlbec@...lplan.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists