linux-ext4 - Re: [PATCH 4/4] ext4: fix possible use-after-free ext4_remove_li

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1105201809320.5226@dhcp-27-109.brq.redhat.com>
Date:	Fri, 20 May 2011 18:16:34 +0200 (CEST)
From:	Lukas Czerner <lczerner@...hat.com>
To:	"Ted Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>
cc:	Lukas Czerner <lczerner@...hat.com>,
	Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...hat.com>, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] ext4: fix possible use-after-free
 ext4_remove_li_request()

Hi Ted,

On Fri, 20 May 2011, Ted Ts'o wrote:

> Lukas, are you going to be providing a new version of these patch
> series or not?  

I already did send it as a separate patch series with the version
description.

> 
> If you are, could you do it as a separate patch series, instead of
> only updating one patch as a reply to the mail thread.  When people do
> this, I find it painful since I need to figure out, "ok, I need v2 of
> the 1/4 patch, v3 of the 2/4 patch, v4 of the 3/4 patch, and v3 of of
> the 4/4 patch.  To provide context, please add version descriptors
> after the --- of the patch.  (i.e, "v3 --> v4; fixed commit message")
> 
> Also, if we're going to be doing extended review of patches like this,
> instead of my just fixing things up when I pull stuff in, people need
> to start authoring patches ***much*** sooner.  Doing multiple publish
> and review cycles now that the merge window is open really doesn't
> work.  One way of solving this in the future is to simply not take any
> patch that is first submitted after say, -rc5 or -rc6 until the next
> merge window.  But given that some patches didn't *start* getting much
> review until 2-3 weeks ago, that wouldn't be entirely fair.

We all should do better, but I am not sure that limits like that are very
useful. Some level of flexibility is always needed.

> 
> But for the next merge window, if this is going to work, we need
> people submitting patches earlier, and people reviewing patches
> earlier.

So let's to that people ;).

> 
> Thanks,
> 
> 						- Ted

Thanks Ted!
-Lukas

> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> 

-- 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html