[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110520174241.GC29282@thunk.org>
Date: Fri, 20 May 2011 13:42:41 -0400
From: Ted Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
To: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@...hat.com>
Cc: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...hat.com>, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] ext4: fix possible use-after-free
ext4_remove_li_request()
On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 01:39:46PM -0400, Ted Ts'o wrote:
> On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 06:16:34PM +0200, Lukas Czerner wrote:
> >
> > I already did send it as a separate patch series with the version
> > description.
>
> What, you mean the -v2 patch series?
>
>
> So let me rephrase the question: Is -v2 your final answer?
Ah, never mind. I got confused when with the other patch series where
half the patches where -v3, and the other half were -v2. It makes
what shows up in patchwork hard to follow. In the future, please bump
the version number on the entire series, not just on individual
patches, as it makes it a lot easier for me to track what is going
on....
- Ted
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists