linux-ext4 - Re: [PATCH 4/4] ext4: fix possible use-after-free ext4_remove_li

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4DD6A9AB.1060501@redhat.com>
Date:	Fri, 20 May 2011 12:49:31 -0500
From:	Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...hat.com>
To:	"Ted Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>
CC:	Lukas Czerner <lczerner@...hat.com>, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] ext4: fix possible use-after-free ext4_remove_li_request()

On 5/20/11 12:47 PM, Ted Ts'o wrote:
> On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 11:12:05AM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
>>
>> But skipping thorough review simply because the window is open now
>> doesn't make sense to me.
> 
> Sure, but adding a 24-hour turnaround for at least simple fix ups
> (commit descriptions, comments, white space, etc) doesn't make a lot
> of sense either.
> 
> 						- Ted

I think you are free to use your discretion for those things :)

I mean if the last review comment is "you have a typo here" and
you really want to make the window, it seems quite reasonable to
fix it up, with a note in the commit log.

-Eric
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html