[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110521035704.GW32466@dastard>
Date: Sat, 21 May 2011 13:57:04 +1000
From: Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>
To: Allison Henderson <achender@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...hat.com>,
Ext4 Developers List <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>,
xfs-oss <xfs@....sgi.com>
Subject: Re: [XFS Tests Punch Hole 2/3 v3] XFS TESTS: Add Fallocate Punch
Hole Test Routines
On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 05:46:19PM -0700, Allison Henderson wrote:
> On 5/19/2011 6:22 PM, Allison Henderson wrote:
> >Also, there was one more test that I meant to be a part of this
> >collection, but I was not finished with it at the time I submitted the
> >patch for feedback. Basically it checks to see if a hole can still be
> >punched out when the disk is full. In ext4 this is allowable because
> >reserved space is used to allow the operation to proceed where it would
> >have otherwise failed. I'm not sure if this is also ext4 specific
> >though. Would this be another candidate for adding to 252? Thx!
>
> I just didnt want this question to get washed away in the traffic.
> I am working on an updated patch set, should I include the extra
> test case? Thx!
Yes, though probably not in the _generic_test_punch function. And
extra case specific to 252 that does something like:
umount SCRATCH_DEV
make a small filesystem
scratch_mount
prealloc to ENOSPC
punch
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
david@...morbit.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists