linux-ext4 - ext4 and dir_index optimization

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20110522125237.GC2176@nik-comp.lan>
Date:	Sun, 22 May 2011 14:52:37 +0200
From:	Nikola Ciprich <nikola.ciprich@...uxbox.cz>
To:	linux ext4 list <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>
Cc:	nikola.ciprich@...uxbox.cz,
	Petr Kopecký <petr.kopecky@...uxbox.cz>
Subject: ext4 and dir_index optimization

Hello everybody,

I'd like to ask few questions about dir_index on ext4. On one of my servers
running 2.6.32.14, we were experiencing performance problems, especially
accessing directory with huge (hundreds of thousands) amount of files
was pain. The filesystem had dir_index enabled, so I tried running fsck
-D on it in order to force reindexation. It helped A LOT - ls -1 on this
directory took about 5 minutes, after reindexation, it took about 10
seconds!
So my question is - is it really needed to force reindexation from time
to time? I'm pretty sure dir_index has been enabled since the creation of
filesystem, so shouldn't index be maintained automatically?
Is it possible to check somehow whether optimization is needed, without
umounting fs and running fsck? And possibly also do this optimization?

Thanks a lot in advance!

Cheers!

nik



-- 
-------------------------------------
Ing. Nikola CIPRICH
LinuxBox.cz, s.r.o.
28. rijna 168, 709 01 Ostrava

tel.:   +420 596 603 142
fax:    +420 596 621 273
mobil:  +420 777 093 799

www.linuxbox.cz

mobil servis: +420 737 238 656
email servis: servis@...uxbox.cz
-------------------------------------

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped