linux-ext4 - Re: [PATCH 1/5] jbd2: Pass extra bool parameter in journal routines to specify if its ok to fail the journal transaction allocation.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20110525002520.GM26055@thunk.org>
Date:	Tue, 24 May 2011 20:25:20 -0400
From:	Ted Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
To:	Manish Katiyar <mkatiyar@...il.com>
Cc:	ext4 <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] jbd2: Pass extra bool parameter in journal
 routines to specify if its ok to fail the journal transaction allocation.

On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 05:14:22PM -0700, Manish Katiyar wrote:
> Thanks for your feedback. I'm still learning how to get my somewhat
> useful change into ext4 :-) so will keep these points in mind. Yes,
> Jan had also pointed that these patches need to be bisectable, so
> actually the last version of the patch in the thread should be
> complete in itself. But if you say, I can resend the two patches which
> have been reviewed and ack'd by Jan in a new separate mail thread with
> appropriate changelog and you can ignore these then. Is that ok ?

Yes please.  Since that will cause the other patches to get
renumbered, it's best if you resend them all as a separate mail
thread.

							- Ted
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html