[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4DEE5C73.806@oracle.com>
Date: Tue, 07 Jun 2011 10:14:27 -0700
From: Sunil Mushran <sunil.mushran@...cle.com>
To: "Amir G." <amir73il@...rs.sourceforge.net>
CC: Josef Bacik <josef@...hat.com>, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
tytso@....edu
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 00/30] Ext4 snapshots - core patches
On 06/07/2011 09:46 AM, Amir G. wrote:
> I understand the bitterness in btrfs community regarding ext4 snapshot
> feature. You might say the same things about ext4 64bit feature.
> I think it is not up to us to decide how it rolls. it's the users
> and companies involved that dictate where the development happens.
Bitterness is not the issue. The issue is what happens when your
_patron_ has had enough of the project and decides to stop funding.
Are you going to spend your free time maintaining the entire file system?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists