[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <BANLkTin4iAn5bKJWX=hwkArw_TL+Rk8p+w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2011 20:54:24 +0300
From: "Amir G." <amir73il@...rs.sourceforge.net>
To: Sunil Mushran <sunil.mushran@...cle.com>
Cc: Josef Bacik <josef@...hat.com>, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
tytso@....edu
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 00/30] Ext4 snapshots - core patches
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 8:14 PM, Sunil Mushran <sunil.mushran@...cle.com> wrote:
> On 06/07/2011 09:46 AM, Amir G. wrote:
>>
>> I understand the bitterness in btrfs community regarding ext4 snapshot
>> feature. You might say the same things about ext4 64bit feature.
>> I think it is not up to us to decide how it rolls. it's the users
>> and companies involved that dictate where the development happens.
>
> Bitterness is not the issue. The issue is what happens when your
> _patron_ has had enough of the project and decides to stop funding.
>
My patron is not funding the project for the good of humanity
it has customers using the product and relying on the snapshot
feature.
This is what I meant by market forces driving the development
decisions.
> Are you going to spend your free time maintaining the entire file system?
>
Nope. But if we accept the premise that the ext4 snapshots feature
is something that can drive a business to more income, than I should
have no problem finding a new patron if it comes to that.
Cheers,
Amir.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists