lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4DEDCCAC.9040600@odi.ch>
Date:	Tue, 07 Jun 2011 09:01:00 +0200
From:	Ortwin Glück <odi@....ch>
To:	Ted Ts'o <tytso@....edu>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Oops fs/ext4/inode.c:2188



On 06/06/2011 12:47 AM, Ted Ts'o wrote:
> Were there any messages in the syslog before this relating to ext4 or
> jbd2?
> 
>> Jun  5 20:34:12 box kernel: JBD2: Detected IO errors while flushing file
>> data on sdc1-8
>> Jun  5 20:34:12 box kernel: Aborting journal on device sdc1-8.
>> Jun  5 20:34:12 box kernel: JBD2: I/O error detected when updating
>> journal superblock for sdc1-8.
> 
> For example, anything like these messages *before* the oops messages?
> 
>     	     	      	   	 	  	       - Ted

Of course. I am attaching all relevant log.

The box had a USB disk attached. Unfortunately the USB code detected
only a slow link:
Jun  3 08:36:26 box kernel: usb 2-1: not running at top speed; connect
to a high speed hub

A job was still copying a large file when I disconnected the disk
accidentially two hours later. Of course ext4 didn't like that. But
clearly the Oops should not have happened.

Thanks.

Ortwin

View attachment "messages" of type "text/plain" (7853 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ