linux-ext4 - Re: [PATCH v1 00/30] Ext4 snapshots

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 10 Jun 2011 18:51:28 -0400
From:	Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu
To:	"Amir G." <amir73il@...rs.sourceforge.net>
Cc:	Lukas Czerner <lczerner@...hat.com>,
	Yongqiang Yang <xiaoqiangnk@...il.com>,
	linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, tytso@....edu,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, sandeen@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 00/30] Ext4 snapshots

On Thu, 09 Jun 2011 13:54:13 +0300, "Amir G." said:

> Why do you keep saying 'backup only'?
> There is a huge difference between having long lived snapshots,
> like CTERA products have, and temporary snapshot for backup
> purpose (for which LVM is adequate).

I must have blinked somewhere - I'm not convinced LVM is even "adequate" for
backup purposes.  In particular, how does an LVM-level snapshot deal with the
"metadata in memory" problem (basically the exact same problem as running fsck
on a disk partition that is already mounted)?


Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped