[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110620222324.GB3473@infradead.org>
Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 18:23:24 -0400
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, tglx@...utronix.de,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org, hirofumi@...l.parknet.co.jp,
mfasheh@...e.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/8] fs: always maintain i_dio_count
On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 02:29:24PM -0700, Joel Becker wrote:
> Oh god you're making the world scary. Are you guaranteeing that
> all allocation changes are locked out by the time we get into
> file_aio_write() and file_aio_read()? This is not obvious to me.
I have no idea how ocfs2's internal allocator locking works, but this
patch doesn't change it. What this patch touches is exclusion between
truncate and pending direct I/O requests, and even there only the
implementation and not the semantics.
The old and new semantics are that you may have either
1 ongoing truncate
OR
n (>= 0; <= ATOMIC_T_MAX) ongoing direct I/O reads or writes
before that was enforced using the i_alloc_sem rw_semaphore, including
non-owner releases of it from AIO code, in the new code it's done using
a combination of i_mutex which was already taken in the truncate path,
and when starting new direct I/O requests, and the new i_dio_count
counter.
>
> Joel
>
> --
>
> "Glory is fleeting, but obscurity is forever."
> - Napoleon Bonaparte
>
> http://www.jlbec.org/
> jlbec@...lplan.org
---end quoted text---
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists