linux-ext4 - Re: [PATCH 0/8] remove i_alloc

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20110622142235.GN32133@thunk.org>
Date:	Wed, 22 Jun 2011 10:22:35 -0400
From:	Ted Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
To:	Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Cc:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk,
	tglx@...utronix.de, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org,
	hirofumi@...l.parknet.co.jp, mfasheh@...e.com, jlbec@...lplan.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] remove i_alloc_sem

On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 01:54:25AM +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
> ext4_page_mkwrite()... Ted, what happened to that patch. Should I resend
> it?

So assuming I fix the refcounting issue in fs/ext4/page_io.c (which I
will do not dropping the page's refcount until after the workqueue
finishes its job), does your patch need changing, or is it a matter of
fixing the commit description?

In any case, this dragged got out, and it's late in -rc cycle for 3.0,
so I was planning on queuing this for the next merge window.  (Sorry
for that, this was mostly due to my not having enough time to really
dive into the issues involved.)

							- Ted
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html