[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <404FD5CC-8F27-4336-B7D4-10675C53A588@boeing.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2011 16:19:08 -0500
From: "Moffett, Kyle D" <Kyle.D.Moffett@...ing.com>
To: Sean Ryle <seanbo@...il.com>
CC: "Ted Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>,
"615998@...s.debian.org" <615998@...s.debian.org>,
"linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org" <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>,
Sachin Sant <sachinp@...ibm.com>,
"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: Bug#615998: linux-image-2.6.32-5-xen-amd64: Repeatable "kernel
BUG at fs/jbd2/commit.c:534" from Postfix on ext4
On Jun 23, 2011, at 16:55, Sean Ryle wrote:
> Maybe I am wrong here, but shouldn't the cast be to (unsigned long) or to (sector_t)?
>
> Line 534 of commit.c:
> jbd_debug(4, "JBD: got buffer %llu (%p)\n",
> (unsigned long long)bh->b_blocknr, bh->b_data);
No, that printk() is fine, the format string says "%llu" so the cast is
unsigned long long.
Besides which, line 534 in the Debian 2.6.32 kernel I am using is this
one:
J_ASSERT(commit_transaction->t_nr_buffers <=
commit_transaction->t_outstanding_credits);
If somebody can tell me what information would help to debug this I'd be
more than happy to throw a whole bunch of debug printks under that error
condition and try to trigger the crash with that.
Alternatively I could remove that J_ASSERT() and instead add some debug
further down around the "commit_transaction->t_outstanding_credits--;"
to try to see exactly what IO it's handling when it runs out of credits.
Any ideas?
Cheers,
Kyle Moffett
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists