[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1106271211210.3845@dhcp-27-109.brq.redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2011 12:15:00 +0200 (CEST)
From: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@...hat.com>
To: Robin Dong <hao.bigrat@...il.com>
cc: linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, Robin Dong <sanbai@...bao.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ext4: avoid redundant cache finding if flags not cantian
PUNCH_OUT
On Mon, 27 Jun 2011, Robin Dong wrote:
> In old code, ext4 will find extent in cache first even flags does
> not contian PUNCH_OUT, that may waste some time.
>
> Signed-off-by: Robin Dong <sanbai@...bao.com>
> ---
> fs/ext4/extents.c | 4 ++--
> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/extents.c b/fs/ext4/extents.c
> index eb63c7b..d583ec3 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/extents.c
> +++ b/fs/ext4/extents.c
> @@ -3358,8 +3358,8 @@ int ext4_ext_map_blocks(handle_t *handle, struct inode *inode,
> trace_ext4_ext_map_blocks_enter(inode, map->m_lblk, map->m_len, flags);
>
> /* check in cache */
> - if (ext4_ext_in_cache(inode, map->m_lblk, &newex) &&
> - ((flags & EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_PUNCH_OUT_EXT) == 0)) {
> + if (((flags & EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_PUNCH_OUT_EXT) == 0) &&
> + ext4_ext_in_cache(inode, map->m_lblk, &newex)) {
Hi Robin,
The patch is good thanks, but I think that this:
if (!(flags & EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_PUNCH_OUT_EXT) &&
ext4_ext_in_cache(inode, map->m_lblk, &newex)) {
looks better.
Thanks!
-Lukas
> if (!newex.ee_start_lo && !newex.ee_start_hi) {
> if ((flags & EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_CREATE) == 0) {
> /*
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists