[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110628084947.GN32466@dastard>
Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 18:49:47 +1000
From: Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>
To: Allison Henderson <achender@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: xfs@....sgi.com, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3 v2] XFS TESTS: Fix 252 Failure: Relax fiemap filter
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 10:17:12PM -0700, Allison Henderson wrote:
> On 06/27/2011 09:59 PM, Dave Chinner wrote:
> >On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 09:27:25PM -0700, Allison Henderson wrote:
> >I seriously dislike conditional parameter passing in shell scripts
> >at the best of times, but for filter functions I really think it is
> >the wrong thing to do. It significantly obfuscates the working of
> >the function for no really good reason.
> >
> >Just write a new filter function, and factor out the common parts of
> >them if the amount of code duplication is sufficient to make it
> >desirable to do so.
> >
>
> Ok, it doesn't look like a lot of code, I can separate them into their
> own functions.
>
> >>+ md5sum $testfile | cut -d ' ' -f1
> >
> >Why cut out the file name? It's not like it changes at all....
> >
>
> Oh, it looked like there's a pid attached to the file name, so I
> thought I should remove that from the output
Oh, it does too. My mistake, too trigger happy, just looking for
ways to keep things relatively simple. Maybe using a wrapper
function so if we ever need to modify it we only need to change one
line of code would acheive the same thing?
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
david@...morbit.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists