linux-ext4 - Re: [PATCH] ext4: ext4_orphan_add() remove unnecessary comments

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20110711224734.GU28763@thunk.org>
Date:	Mon, 11 Jul 2011 18:47:34 -0400
From:	Ted Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
To:	Lukas Czerner <lczerner@...hat.com>
Cc:	linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ext4: ext4_orphan_add() remove unnecessary comments

On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 04:50:17PM +0200, Lukas Czerner wrote:
> The comment from Al Viro about possible race in the ext4_orphan_add() is
> not justified. There is no race possible as we always have either i_mutex
> locked, or the inode can not be referenced from outside hence the
> J_ASSERS should not be hit from the reason described in comment.
> 
> This commit replaces it with notion that we are holding i_mutex so it
> should not be possible for i_nlink to be changed while waiting for
> s_orphan_lock.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@...hat.com>

Applied, thanks.

						- Ted
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html