[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110727110148.204979.49551.stgit@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2011 13:02:44 +0200
From: Bernd Schubert <bernd.schubert@...m.fraunhofer.de>
To: linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, yong.fan@...mcloud.com,
adilger@...mcloud.com, tytso@....edu
Subject: [PATCH 0/3] 32/64 bit llseek hashes
With the ext3/ext4 directory index implementation hashes are used to specify
offsets for llseek(). For compatibility with NFSv2 and 32-bit user space
on 64-bit systems (kernel space) ext3/ext4 currently only return 32-bit
hashes and therefore the probability of hash collisions for larger directories
is rather high. As recently reported on the NFS mailing list that theoretical
problem also happens on real systems:
http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.nfs/40863
The following series adds two new open flags to tell ext4
to to 32-bit or 64-bit hash values for llseek() calls.
These flags are then used by NFS to use 32-bit (NFSv2) or 64-bit
offsets (hashes in case of ext3/ext4) for readdir and seekdir.
User space does not need to specify these flags, but usually the check
for is_32bit_api() should be sufficient.
---
Bernd Schubert (2):
Remove check for a 32-bit cookie in nfsd4_readdir()
nfsd: vfs_llseek() with O_32BITHASH or O_64BITHASH
Fan Yong (1):
Return 32/64-bit dir name hash according to usage type
fs/ext4/dir.c | 160 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
fs/fcntl.c | 5 +
fs/nfsd/nfs4proc.c | 2 -
fs/nfsd/vfs.c | 6 ++
include/asm-generic/fcntl.h | 9 ++
5 files changed, 145 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-)
--
Bernd Schubert
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists