[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110729131937.GB5910@noexit.corp.google.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2011 06:19:38 -0700
From: Joel Becker <jlbec@...lplan.org>
To: Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@...ger.ca>
Cc: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@...ibm.com>,
Andreas Dilger <aedilger@...il.com>,
Mingming Cao <cmm@...ibm.com>, Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>,
linux-ext4 <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Add inode checksum support to ext4
On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 03:48:45AM -0600, Andreas Dilger wrote:
> On 2011-07-28, at 4:07 PM, Joel Becker wrote:
> > We use ethernet crc32 in ocfs2. btrfs uses crc32c. Frankly, I
> > could have used crc32c if I'd really thought about the hardware
> > acceleration benefits. I think it's a good idea for ext4.
>
> The problem with crc32[c] is that if you don't have hardware acceleration
> it is terribly slow.
We find ethernet crc32 just fine in ocfs2. I use the kernel's
implementation, which survives everyone's network traffic, and of course
we added the triggers to jbd2 so we only have to do the calculations on
read and write.
> Yes, it makes sense to just put a "fake" dirent at the end of the leaf block,
> or similar. I don't think it is necessary to modify existing directories or
> extent blocks to add these structures in, if there is no room, but for new
> blocks, or blocks with space it is enough.
We have tunefs.ocfs2 code to adjust existing directories to add
the trailer. It's not too bad, really.
Joel
--
"People with narrow minds usually have broad tongues."
http://www.jlbec.org/
jlbec@...lplan.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists