[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAC5umyjxG3k2L3mozmd-Dfb08mMt1ZEZdrsAdhAjbZTkEy_OoQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2011 19:55:12 +0900
From: Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@...il.com>
To: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@...hat.com>, amir73il@...il.com,
xiaoqiangnk@...il.com
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, tytso@....edu,
linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, adilger.kernel@...ger.ca
Subject: Re: [patch 1/1] ext4: use proper little-endian bitops
2011/7/29 Lukas Czerner <lczerner@...hat.com>:
>> diff -puN fs/ext4/ext4.h~ext4-use-proper-little-endian-bitops fs/ext4/ext4.h
>> --- a/fs/ext4/ext4.h~ext4-use-proper-little-endian-bitops
>> +++ a/fs/ext4/ext4.h
>> @@ -931,12 +931,13 @@ struct ext4_inode_info {
>> #define test_opt2(sb, opt) (EXT4_SB(sb)->s_mount_opt2 & \
>> EXT4_MOUNT2_##opt)
>>
>> -#define ext4_set_bit __test_and_set_bit_le
>> +#define ext4_test_and_set_bit __test_and_set_bit_le
>> +#define ext4_set_bit __set_bit_le
>> #define ext4_set_bit_atomic ext2_set_bit_atomic
> We can remove this since it is not used anywhere and it is just a macro
> for test_and_set_bit_le() anyway.
Amir Goldstein requested not to remove it because ext4 snapshot patches is
using ext4_set_bit_atomic(), although I really don't know about the status of
mainline inclusion.
> Other than that it looks good. You can add my
>
> Reviewed-by: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@...hat.com>
Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists