| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <1EC3A2BF-642E-4B4C-9D98-F3032AB0B572@dilger.ca> Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2011 10:02:26 -0600 From: Andreas Dilger <adilger@...ger.ca> To: markus hansen <hansenmarkus@....de> Cc: "linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org" <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: fsck.ext4 multiply-claimed blocks On 2011-08-03, at 3:10 AM, "markus hansen" <hansenmarkus@....de> wrote: > I have a huge crashed ext4 filesystem with lots of Hardlinks in it. fsck.ext4 has not completed after 24h, handling "multiply-claimed blocks" eats the time. Stupid beginner question: Are the offered two Options (a) "copy multiply claimed blocks" (b) "delete inodes" useful in case multiple hardlinks point to same blocks? Isnt it ok in that case, that blocks are multiply claimed? Multiply claimed blocks means they are claimed by multiple different inodes, and is unrelated to hard links. Cheers, Andreas-- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists