linux-ext4 - Re: Feature request: e2fsck -z

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20110810132526.GA726@thunk.org>
Date:	Wed, 10 Aug 2011 09:25:26 -0400
From:	Ted Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
To:	Ric Wheeler <ricwheeler@...il.com>
Cc:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Feature request: e2fsck -z

On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 07:34:46AM +0100, Ric Wheeler wrote:
> 
> Do you need it to be in the fsck tool?

As others have noted, (a) zerofree does this already, and (b) there's
also -E discard.

My take on it though is that it's a reasonable request.  It's much
like there is "sort -u" even though you could do this via "sort |
uniq".  Part of the Unix philosophy is to use tools that are
composable, yes --- but optimizing for common cases is also a good
thing, and with the advent of virtualization being more and more
popular, zeroing free blocks for virtualization images is good and
useful thing.

This is also why I agitated for adding support so that e2fsprogs tools
could operate directly on qemu-img files, and not just have support
which is hacked into e2image.  Yes, you can always take an qemu-img
file, decompress and expand it into a raw file, run debugfs or e2fsck
on it, and then convert it back to a qemu-img file --- but if lots of
people are doing that, it does make sense to optimize for the most
common use cases.

						- Ted
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html