[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1108111700500.29009@dhcp-27-109.brq.redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2011 17:01:37 +0200 (CEST)
From: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@...hat.com>
To: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@...hat.com>
cc: linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, tytso@....edu, jack@...e.cz,
sandeen@...hat.com, adilger@...06002191d9348c.cg.shawcable.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ext4: Deprecate data=journal mount option
On Tue, 28 Jun 2011, Lukas Czerner wrote:
> Data journalling mode (data=journal) is known to be neglected by
> developers and only minority of people is actually using it. This
> mode is also less tested than the other two modes by the developers.
>
> This creates a dangerous combination, because the option which seems
> *safer* is actually less safe the others. So this commit adds a warning
> message in case that data=journal mode is used, so the user is informed
> that the mode might be removed in the future.
Any comments on this ? Is that feasible to remove is someday ?
Thanks!
-Lukas
>
> Signed-off-by: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@...hat.com>
> ---
> fs/ext4/super.c | 5 +++++
> 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/super.c b/fs/ext4/super.c
> index 9ea71aa..9d189cf 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/super.c
> +++ b/fs/ext4/super.c
> @@ -1631,6 +1631,11 @@ static int parse_options(char *options, struct super_block *sb,
> sbi->s_min_batch_time = option;
> break;
> case Opt_data_journal:
> + ext4_msg(sb, KERN_WARNING,
> + "Using data=journal may be removed in the "
> + "future. Please, contact "
> + "linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org if you are "
> + "using this feature.");
> data_opt = EXT4_MOUNT_JOURNAL_DATA;
> goto datacheck;
> case Opt_data_ordered:
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists