[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4E49447F.105@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2011 11:08:31 -0500
From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...hat.com>
To: Tao Ma <tm@....ma>
CC: linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, mjt@....msk.ru
Subject: Re: DIO process stuck apparently due to dioread_nolock (3.0)
On 8/13/11 11:02 AM, Tao Ma wrote:
> From: Tao Ma <boyu.mt@...bao.com>
>
> Hi Michael,
> could you please check whether this patch work for you?
Thanks, this is the patch I meant to send, I guess ;) I think
I missed the "|=" case before :(
given that every place we set it requires a test and an increment
if not set, maybe a helper to do all that is in order?
-Eric
>
> Subject: [PATCH] ext4: Set unwritten flag and increase i_aiodio_unwritten simultaneously.
> From 4f1d797973da8b5cf79f58cc1e4d22efb9d46d19 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Tao Ma <boyu.mt@...bao.com>
> Date: Sat, 13 Aug 2011 23:50:28 +0800
> Subject: [PATCH] ext4: Set unwritten flag and increase i_aiodio_unwritten simultaneously.
>
> EXT4_IO_END_UNWRITTEN flag set and the increase of i_aiodio_unwritten should
> be done simultaneously since ext4_end_io_nolock always clear the flag and
> decrease the counter in the same time.
>
> We don't increase i_aiodio_unwritten when setting EXT4_IO_END_UNWRITTEN so
> it will go nagative and causes some process to wait forever.
>
> Part of the patch came from Eric in his e-mail.
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-ext4&m=131316851417460&w=2
>
> Reported-by: Michael Tokarev<mjt@....msk.ru>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...hat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Tao Ma <boyu.mt@...bao.com>
> ---
> fs/ext4/inode.c | 9 ++++++++-
> fs/ext4/page-io.c | 6 ++++--
> 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/inode.c b/fs/ext4/inode.c
> index d47264c..40c0b10 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/inode.c
> +++ b/fs/ext4/inode.c
> @@ -2668,8 +2668,15 @@ static void ext4_end_io_buffer_write(struct buffer_head *bh, int uptodate)
> goto out;
> }
>
> - io_end->flag = EXT4_IO_END_UNWRITTEN;
> + /*
> + * It may be over-defensive here to check EXT4_IO_END_UNWRITTEN now,
> + * but being more careful is always safe for the future change.
> + */
> inode = io_end->inode;
> + if (!(io_end->flag & EXT4_IO_END_UNWRITTEN)) {
> + io_end->flag |= EXT4_IO_END_UNWRITTEN;
> + atomic_inc(&EXT4_I(inode)->i_aiodio_unwritten);
> + }
>
> /* Add the io_end to per-inode completed io list*/
> spin_lock_irqsave(&EXT4_I(inode)->i_completed_io_lock, flags);
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/page-io.c b/fs/ext4/page-io.c
> index 430c401..78839af 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/page-io.c
> +++ b/fs/ext4/page-io.c
> @@ -334,8 +334,10 @@ submit_and_retry:
> if ((io_end->num_io_pages >= MAX_IO_PAGES) &&
> (io_end->pages[io_end->num_io_pages-1] != io_page))
> goto submit_and_retry;
> - if (buffer_uninit(bh))
> - io->io_end->flag |= EXT4_IO_END_UNWRITTEN;
> + if (buffer_uninit(bh) && !(io_end->flag & EXT4_IO_END_UNWRITTEN)) {
> + io_end->flag |= EXT4_IO_END_UNWRITTEN;
> + atomic_inc(&EXT4_I(inode)->i_aiodio_unwritten);
> + }
> io->io_end->size += bh->b_size;
> io->io_next_block++;
> ret = bio_add_page(io->io_bio, bh->b_page, bh->b_size, bh_offset(bh));
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists