lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 22 Aug 2011 12:33:29 -0400
From:	Ted Ts'o <>
To:	Ivan Shmakov <>
Subject: Re: e2p_blocks_count () vs. ext2fs_blocks_count ()

On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 10:25:19AM +0700, Ivan Shmakov wrote:
> 	Apparently, e2p_blocks_count (), a ‘static’ function in
> 	lib/e2p/ls.c, duplicates the public ext2fs_blocks_count () one
> 	(lib/ext2fs/blknum.c) as of d4c0d8e5.  The same holds for
> 	e2p_r_blocks_count () and e2p_free_blocks_count ().
> 	The code is, as it seems, exactly the same.
> 	I wonder, isn't there a problem?

That's deliberate; the goal was to make libe2p not dependent on
libext2fs, so that programs such as lsattr don't need to pull in

						- Ted
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at

Powered by blists - more mailing lists