[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4E57630B.7000202@tao.ma>
Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2011 17:10:35 +0800
From: Tao Ma <tm@....ma>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
CC: Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>, Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>,
Jiaying Zhang <jiayingz@...gle.com>, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [URGENT PATCH] ext4: fix potential deadlock in ext4_evict_inode()
Hi Christoph,
On 08/26/2011 04:50 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 06:44:03PM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
>> While the lockdep report is false positive, I agree that your
>> change is the right fix to make - the IO completions are already
>> queued on the workqueue, so they don't need to be flushed to get
>> them to complete. All that needs to be done is call
>> ext4_ioend_wait() for them to complete, and that gets rid of the
>> i_mutex altogether. (*)
>
> The really correct fix is to stop using the ioend wait like I did
> in my pending series for XFS. The only thing preventing ext4 from
> doing that is that it marks pages uptodate from irq context,
> before finishing the ioends. This has a lot of nasty implications
> as the the page might be marked uptodate without actually having
> that state on disk.
yeah, the DIO read on a buffer write file issue is also another side
effect of it.[1]
So could you please talk a little more about how xfs handle it now?
[1] http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-ext4/msg27139.html
Thanks
Tao
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists