lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Fri, 26 Aug 2011 07:35:24 -0400
From:	Theodore Tso <tytso@....EDU>
To:	Christoph Hellwig <>
Cc:	Tao Ma <>, Dave Chinner <>,
	Jiaying Zhang <>,
Subject: Re: [URGENT PATCH] ext4: fix potential deadlock in ext4_evict_inode()

On Aug 26, 2011, at 5:17 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:

> The thing I have queued up for 3.2 makes it very simple:  we do not
> track I/O ends any more at all, outside of the workqueue.
> For buffered I/O we only mark the page uptodate when all unwritten
> extent conversion and size updates have finished.  All data integrity
> callers and inode eviction wait for the pages to be update so we are
> covered.
> For direct I/O we only call inode_dio_done and aio_complete once all
> unwritten extent size updates are done.  Inodes can't be evicted until
> we drop a reference to the inode, which can't happen until the
> sync or async dio is done and we drop the inode reference the VFS
> holds for it.  Sync and fsync are only guaranteed to pick up I/O
> that has returned to userspace, so we are covered for that as well.

Long term, I definitely want to make ext4 do something similar. 
What we have now is just way too fragile…

-- Ted

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at

Powered by blists - more mailing lists