[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110907223208.GH7725@quack.suse.cz>
Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2011 00:32:08 +0200
From: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
To: Greg Freemyer <greg.freemyer@...il.com>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
Masayoshi MIZUMA <m.mizuma@...fujitsu.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@...ger.ca>,
linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
Valerie Aurora <val@...consulting.com>
Subject: Re: [BUG] ext3: cannot unfreeze a filesystem due to a deadlock
On Wed 07-09-11 13:56:08, Greg Freemyer wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 1:34 PM, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz> wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > Thanks for report!
> >
> > On Wed 07-09-11 12:29:30, Masayoshi MIZUMA wrote:
> >> When I checked the freeze feature for ext3 filesystem using fsfreeze
> >> command at 3.1.0-rc4, I think the following deadlock problem happened.
> >>
> >> How to reproduce:
> >> # mkfs -t ext3 /dev/sdd1
> >> # mount /dev/sdd1 /MNT
> >> # ./fsstress -d /MNT/tmp -n 10 -p 1000 > /dev/null 2>&1 &
> >> # fsfreeze -f /MNT
> >> # fsfreeze -u /MNT
> >>
> >> If this deadlock is reproduced, "fsfreeze -u /MNT" does not return.
> >>
> >> The detail of deadlock:
> >> o [flush-8:16:1523]
> >> wb_do_writeback
> >> wb_writeback
> >> ...
> >> ext3_journalled_writepage
> >> journal_start
> >> start_this_handle
> >> # waiting until journal->j_barrier_count turns 0...
> >> # j_barrier_count was incremented by journal_lock_updates()
> >> # via ext3_freeze().
> >>
> >> o [fsstress:2673]
> >> sys_sync
> >> sync_filesystems
> >> iterate_supers
> >> down_read(sb->s_umount)
> >> sync_one_sb
> >> __sync_filesystem
> >> writeback_inodes_sb
> >> writeback_inodes_sb_nr
> >> wait_for_completion
> >> wait_for_common
> >> # waiting for completion of [flush-8:16:1523]...
> >>
> >> o [fsfreeze:2749]
> >> sys_ioctl
> >> do_vfs_ioctl
> >> thaw_super
> >> # waiting for down_write(sb->s_umount)...
> >> # [fsfreeze:2673] did down_read(sb->s_umount).
> > Yes, this is a classical deadlock that can happen for any filesystem. The
> > problem is flusher thread holds s_umount semaphore (either directly, or as
> > in your case, indirectly via blocked sync) and tries to do some IO which
> > blocks on frozen filesystem. It's particularly easy to hit for ext3 because
> > it doesn't do vfs_check_frozen() checks but all other filesystems have the
> > race window as well. Val Henson is working on fixing the problem - she even
> > has some first version of patches I believe.
> >
> > Honza
>
> xfstests test 068 has been around since kernel 2.4 days and should
> have caught it if xfs is impacted.
>
> I know I ran the 2002 version many times to prove to myself that
> fsfreeze for xfs was stable when teamed with LVM. (It wasn't when I
> first wrote 068 way back then).
>
> 068 has been greatly simplified since 2002, but it still looks like it
> should do a good job.
>
> Is there a problem with 068? Does it need extra test coverage even for xfs?
I believe at least mmapped writes can trigger the deadlock even for xfs
and fsstress (slightly surprisingly) does not test that. It's a narrow race
window but it is there and it has been triggered in practice (for ext4 but
it's a race in VFS code used by both XFS and ext4). So maybe extending
fsstress would be a way to go?
Honza
--
Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
SUSE Labs, CR
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists