linux-ext4 - Re: [PATCH 11/37] libext2fs: Create the inode bitmap checksum

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20110914193150.GZ12086@tux1.beaverton.ibm.com>
Date:	Wed, 14 Sep 2011 12:31:50 -0700
From:	"Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@...ibm.com>
To:	"Ted Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>
Cc:	Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@...ger.ca>,
	Sunil Mushran <sunil.mushran@...cle.com>,
	Amir Goldstein <amir73il@...il.com>,
	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
	Mingming Cao <cmm@...ibm.com>,
	Joel Becker <jlbec@...lplan.org>, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
	Coly Li <colyli@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/37] libext2fs: Create the inode bitmap checksum

On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 01:02:59PM -0400, Ted Ts'o wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 05:36:22PM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> > diff --git a/lib/ext2fs/ext2_fs.h b/lib/ext2fs/ext2_fs.h
> > index 1f08673..367bfdf 100644
> > --- a/lib/ext2fs/ext2_fs.h
> > +++ b/lib/ext2fs/ext2_fs.h
> > @@ -169,7 +169,8 @@ struct ext4_group_desc
> >  	__u16	bg_free_inodes_count_hi;/* Free inodes count MSB */
> >  	__u16	bg_used_dirs_count_hi;	/* Directories count MSB */
> >  	__u16	bg_itable_unused_hi;	/* Unused inodes count MSB */
> > -	__u32	bg_reserved2[3];
> > +	__u32	bg_inode_bitmap_csum;	/* crc32c(uuid+group+ibitmap) */
> > +	__u32	bg_reserved2[2];
> >  };
> 
> 
> One of the reasons why I like to coalesce the patches to the data
> structures into their own separate commit, is it's hard when I'm
> reviewing individual patches in a mail reader what's going on from a
> big picture spective.  (Heck, even just *finding* the patches that
> modify the on-disk format is hard....)
> 
> But as near as I can tell, your patch series only uses one of the
> 32-bit fields in bg_reserved.  Is there a good reason why
> bg_inode_bitmap_csum can't also used one of the two fields in
> bg_reserved?  That way we get two 32-bit checksums for both struct
> ext2_group_desc and struct ext4_group_desc.  Is there a third 32-bit
> per-block group checksum I'm forgetting about? 

No, but I was under the impression that Amir was using one of bg_reserved for
snapshots.  If that's not true, I'll move both bitmap checksums to bg_reserved.

--D
> 
> 	  		     		       - Ted
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html