linux-ext4 - Re: [PATCH 1/2] libext2fs: add metadata checksum and snapshot feature flags

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 16 Sep 2011 10:28:25 -0400
From:	Ted Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
To:	Andreas Dilger <adilger@...ger.ca>
Cc:	Ext4 Developers List <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>,
	"Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@...ibm.com>,
	Amir Goldstein <amir73il@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] libext2fs: add metadata checksum and snapshot
 feature flags

On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 09:57:33PM -0600, Andreas Dilger wrote:
> True, but at the same time is there a reason _not_ to put the checksum
> at the end?  For the superblock in particular it seems easy to do and
> simplifies the code either way.

For the superblock, OK.  I'll buy that and I'll make the change so
that tail end of the superblock looks like this:

     __u32    s_overhead_blocks;      /* overhead blocks/clusters in fs */
     __u32   s_reserved[108];        /* Padding to the end of the block */
     __u32   s_checksum;	     	/* crc32c(superblock) */
};

							- Ted


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html