[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1316530170-3965-2-git-send-email-dmonakhov@openvz.org>
Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2011 18:49:27 +0400
From: Dmitry Monakhov <dmonakhov@...nvz.org>
To: linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Cc: tytso@....edu, achender@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
Dmitry Monakhov <dmonakhov@...nvz.org>
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] ext4: cleanup ext4_ext_grow_indepth code
Currently code make an impression what grow procedure is very complicated
and some mythical paths, blocks are involved. But in fact grow in depth
it relatively simple procedure:
1) Just create new meta block and copy root data to that block.
2) Convert root from extent to index if old depth == 0
3) update root block pointer
This patch does:
- Reorganize code to make it more self explanatory
- Do not pass path parameter to new_meta_block() in order to
provoke allocation from inode's group because top-level block
should site closer to it's inode, but not to leaf data block.
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Monakhov <dmonakhov@...nvz.org>
---
fs/ext4/extents.c | 41 +++++++++++++++--------------------------
1 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/ext4/extents.c b/fs/ext4/extents.c
index 0ac5a63..b3a08f0 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/extents.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/extents.c
@@ -1042,16 +1042,14 @@ cleanup:
*/
static int ext4_ext_grow_indepth(handle_t *handle, struct inode *inode,
unsigned int flags,
- struct ext4_ext_path *path,
struct ext4_extent *newext)
{
- struct ext4_ext_path *curp = path;
struct ext4_extent_header *neh;
struct buffer_head *bh;
ext4_fsblk_t newblock;
int err = 0;
- newblock = ext4_ext_new_meta_block(handle, inode, path,
+ newblock = ext4_ext_new_meta_block(handle, inode, NULL,
newext, &err, flags);
if (newblock == 0)
return err;
@@ -1071,7 +1069,8 @@ static int ext4_ext_grow_indepth(handle_t *handle, struct inode *inode,
}
/* move top-level index/leaf into new block */
- memmove(bh->b_data, curp->p_hdr, sizeof(EXT4_I(inode)->i_data));
+ memmove(bh->b_data, EXT4_I(inode)->i_data,
+ sizeof(EXT4_I(inode)->i_data));
/* set size of new block */
neh = ext_block_hdr(bh);
@@ -1089,32 +1088,23 @@ static int ext4_ext_grow_indepth(handle_t *handle, struct inode *inode,
if (err)
goto out;
- /* create index in new top-level index: num,max,pointer */
- err = ext4_ext_get_access(handle, inode, curp);
- if (err)
- goto out;
-
- curp->p_hdr->eh_magic = EXT4_EXT_MAGIC;
- curp->p_hdr->eh_max = cpu_to_le16(ext4_ext_space_root_idx(inode, 0));
- curp->p_hdr->eh_entries = cpu_to_le16(1);
- curp->p_idx = EXT_FIRST_INDEX(curp->p_hdr);
-
- if (path[0].p_hdr->eh_depth)
- curp->p_idx->ei_block =
- EXT_FIRST_INDEX(path[0].p_hdr)->ei_block;
- else
- curp->p_idx->ei_block =
- EXT_FIRST_EXTENT(path[0].p_hdr)->ee_block;
- ext4_idx_store_pblock(curp->p_idx, newblock);
-
+ /* Update top-level index: num,max,pointer */
neh = ext_inode_hdr(inode);
+ neh->eh_entries = cpu_to_le16(1);
+ ext4_idx_store_pblock(EXT_FIRST_INDEX(neh), newblock);
+ if (neh->eh_depth == 0) {
+ /* Root extent block becomes index block */
+ neh->eh_max = cpu_to_le16(ext4_ext_space_root_idx(inode, 0));
+ EXT_FIRST_INDEX(neh)->ei_block =
+ EXT_FIRST_EXTENT(neh)->ee_block;
+ }
ext_debug("new root: num %d(%d), lblock %d, ptr %llu\n",
le16_to_cpu(neh->eh_entries), le16_to_cpu(neh->eh_max),
le32_to_cpu(EXT_FIRST_INDEX(neh)->ei_block),
ext4_idx_pblock(EXT_FIRST_INDEX(neh)));
- neh->eh_depth = cpu_to_le16(path->p_depth + 1);
- err = ext4_ext_dirty(handle, inode, curp);
+ neh->eh_depth = cpu_to_le16(neh->eh_depth + 1);
+ ext4_mark_inode_dirty(handle, inode);
out:
brelse(bh);
@@ -1162,8 +1152,7 @@ repeat:
err = PTR_ERR(path);
} else {
/* tree is full, time to grow in depth */
- err = ext4_ext_grow_indepth(handle, inode, flags,
- path, newext);
+ err = ext4_ext_grow_indepth(handle, inode, flags, newext);
if (err)
goto out;
--
1.7.2.3
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists