linux-ext4 - Re: [PATCH] xfstests: Assume yes when test device is not partitioned

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1316726084.2009.85.camel@doink>
Date:	Thu, 22 Sep 2011 16:14:44 -0500
From:	Alex Elder <aelder@....com>
To:	Prasad Joshi <prasadjoshi.linux@...il.com>
CC:	<linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>,
	Chaitanya Kulkarni <chaitanyakulkarni15@...il.com>,
	<xfs@....sgi.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfstests: Assume yes when test device is not
 partitioned

On Sat, 2011-09-03 at 14:03 +0530, Prasad Joshi wrote:
> If an entire device used for file system creation, the mkfs.ext2/3/4
> asks for confirmation before proceeding. Since the device is
> configured for testing it is safe to assume positive response
> during mkfs.
> 
> The patch also replaces hard coded mkfs path with MKFS_PROG variable.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Chaitanya Kulkarni <chaitanyakulkarni15@...il.com>
> Signed-off-by: Prasad Joshi <prasadjoshi.linux@...il.com>

Thanks for submitting a patch, Prasad (and Chaitanya).

Can you please re-submit this?  Based on feedback what
we're looking for would be:
[PATCH 0/2] description e-mail
[PATCH 1/2] patch that substitutes /sbin/mkfs with ${MKFS_PROG}
[PATCH 2/2] patch that adds a '-f' flag to ${MKFS_PROG}.${FSTYP}
            for all ext* filesystem types.

Thanks.

					-Alex


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html