[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110930194541.GW12086@tux1.beaverton.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2011 12:45:41 -0700
From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@...ibm.com>
To: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>
Cc: linux-ext4 <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ext4: ext4_mkdir should dirty dir_block with the
parent inode
On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 08:39:54PM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> ext4_mkdir calls ext4_handle_dirty_metadata with dir_block and the inode "dir".
> Unfortunately, dir_block belongs to the newly created directory (which is
> "inode"), not the parent directory (which is "dir"). Fix the incorrect
> association.
Any thoughts about this one, Ted?
--D
>
> Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@...ibm.com>
> ---
>
> fs/ext4/namei.c | 2 +-
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/namei.c b/fs/ext4/namei.c
> index 2b5c34b..a2c2855 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/namei.c
> +++ b/fs/ext4/namei.c
> @@ -1866,7 +1866,7 @@ retry:
> ext4_set_de_type(dir->i_sb, de, S_IFDIR);
> inode->i_nlink = 2;
> BUFFER_TRACE(dir_block, "call ext4_handle_dirty_metadata");
> - err = ext4_handle_dirty_metadata(handle, dir, dir_block);
> + err = ext4_handle_dirty_metadata(handle, inode, dir_block);
> if (err)
> goto out_clear_inode;
> err = ext4_mark_inode_dirty(handle, inode);
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists