[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1317916878.1823.2.camel@Joe-Laptop>
Date: Thu, 06 Oct 2011 09:01:18 -0700
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: Fabrice Jouhaud <yargil@...e.fr>
Cc: linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, tytso@....edu,
adilger.kernel@...ger.ca, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] [SIGNED-OFF] ext4: don't work without procfs
On Thu, 2011-10-06 at 17:51 +0200, Fabrice Jouhaud wrote:
> From: Yargil <yargil@...e.fr>
It would be better to use your full name on the "From: " line
> Regression from commit dd68314ccf3fb918c1fb6471817edbc60ece4b52
> The problem come from the test of the return value of proc_mkdir
> that is always false without procfs and abort the init of ext4.
>
> Signed-off-by: Fabrice Jouhaud <yargil@...e.fr>
> ---
> fs/ext4/super.c | 2 ++
> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/super.c b/fs/ext4/super.c
> index 44d0c8d..9b51b17 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/super.c
> +++ b/fs/ext4/super.c
> @@ -4985,8 +4985,10 @@ static int __init ext4_init_fs(void)
> if (!ext4_kset)
> goto out6;
> ext4_proc_root = proc_mkdir("fs/ext4", NULL);
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PROC_FS
> if (!ext4_proc_root)
> goto out5;
> +#endif
It would make more sense as:
+#ifdef CONFIG_PROC_FS
ext4_proc_root = proc_mkdir("fs/ext4", NULL);
if (!ext4_proc_root)
goto out5;
+#endif
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists