[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20111116164356.GT2626@amd.home.annexia.org>
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2011 16:43:56 +0000
From: "Richard W.M. Jones" <rjones@...hat.com>
To: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, meyering@...hat.com
Subject: Re: Difference in statvfs(2) block count with ext2 and very recent
Linux 3.2.0 kernels
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 10:33:19AM -0600, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 11/16/11 3:54 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > We do some automated testing of the kernel and ext2/3/4 filesystems,
> > and noticed that the block count returned by statvfs(2) for plain
> > *ext2* filesystems has changed with the latest 3.2.0rc1 kernel.
> >
> > This is probably just because of more accurate block accounting, but I
> > just wanted to check that it isn't a bug.
> >
> > This posting contains the numbers and a reproducer:
> >
> > https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2011-November/msg00051.html
> >
> > Rich.
> >
>
> Note that it is a plain *ext2* filesystem run through the *ext4* driver,
> in Fedora,
Correct! We're using CONFIG_EXT4_USE_FOR_EXT23=y.
> and it was tracked down to commit f975d6bcc7a698a10cc755115e27d3612dcfe322
> ext4: teach ext4_statfs() to deal with clusters if bigalloc is enabled
> according to the above post...
Well, that's what I thought looked likely. However I didn't bisect
this, so it could be another commit to blame ...
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
virt-df lists disk usage of guests without needing to install any
software inside the virtual machine. Supports Linux and Windows.
http://et.redhat.com/~rjones/virt-df/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists