[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4ED1FBE2.8020001@tao.ma>
Date: Sun, 27 Nov 2011 16:59:14 +0800
From: Tao Ma <tm@....ma>
To: Yongqiang Yang <xiaoqiangnk@...il.com>
CC: "linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org" <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>,
"achender@...ux.vnet.ibm.com" <achender@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"tytso@....edu" <tytso@....edu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] ext4: let mpage_submit_io works well when blocksize
< pagesize
On 11/27/2011 09:29 AM, Yongqiang Yang wrote:
>
>
> On Saturday, November 26, 2011, Tao Ma <tm@....ma <mailto:tm@....ma>> wrote:
>> On 11/26/2011 11:13 PM, Yongqiang Yang wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> It can be tested by xfstests 61 or 91, I did not remember which one.
>> ok, I will try it later. But I still wonder how it happens. See my
>> comments below.
>>>
>>> It can be reproduced by reading on a fallocted block and write the block
>>> after the fallocted block. Then the written block can not be written
>>> out by da_writepages.
>> Why? in read no bh will be created, and in write only the written bh
>> will be mapped and set unwritten. How could that happen? Sorry, but this
>> explanation doesn't convince me.
> Ok! The bug was found with punch hole enabled, and punch hole creates
> empty buffers sometimes.
> Actually, punching hole can read the whole page like read operation
> does, but it do not. May be this is the source of the problem.
> The problemastic function is discard_partial_buffers. I post a patch
> fixing another bug in it in this series. If we read whole page in this
> function, the problem can also be solved.
Got it and thanks for the explanation. So we introduced a bug and then
fix it in another way. ;)
Thanks
Tao
>
> Yongqiang.
>>>
>>> Yongqiang.
>>>
>>> On Saturday, November 26, 2011, Tao Ma <tm@....ma <mailto:tm@....ma>
> <mailto:tm@....ma <mailto:tm@....ma>>> wrote:
>>>> Hi Yongqiang,
>>>> On 11/23/2011 05:15 PM, Yongqiang Yang wrote:
>>>>> If there is a unwritten but clean buffer in a page and there is a
>>> dirty buffer
>>>>> after the buffer, then mpage_submit_io does not write the dirty
>>> buffer out.
>>>>> As a result, da_writepages loops forever.
>>>> Did you ever meet with this bug or just find it to be a possible bug by
>>>> skimming the code? Actually, I can't find a proper way to get a buffer
>>>> which can satisfy the check.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks
>>>> Tao
>>>>>
>>>>> This patch fixes the problem by checking dirty flag.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Yongqiang Yang <xiaoqiangnk@...il.com
> <mailto:xiaoqiangnk@...il.com>
>>> <mailto:xiaoqiangnk@...il.com <mailto:xiaoqiangnk@...il.com>>>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> fs/ext4/inode.c | 7 +++++--
>>>>> 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/fs/ext4/inode.c b/fs/ext4/inode.c
>>>>> index 755f6c7..20a1d17 100644
>>>>> --- a/fs/ext4/inode.c
>>>>> +++ b/fs/ext4/inode.c
>>>>> @@ -1339,8 +1339,11 @@ static int mpage_da_submit_io(struct
>>> mpage_da_data *mpd,
>>>>> clear_buffer_unwritten(bh);
>>>>> }
>>>>>
>>>>> - /* skip page if block allocation
> undone */
>>>>> - if (buffer_delay(bh) ||
>>> buffer_unwritten(bh))
>>>>> + /*
>>>>> + * skip page if block allocation
> undone and
>>>>> + * block is dirty
>>>>> + */
>>>>> + if (ext4_bh_delay_or_unwritten(NULL, bh))
>>>>> skip_page = 1;
>>>>> bh = bh->b_this_page;
>>>>> block_start += bh->b_size;
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Best Wishes
>>> Yongqiang Yang
>>>
>>
>>
>
> --
> Best Wishes
> Yongqiang Yang
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists