[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20111202002505.GB19842@gondor.apana.org.au>
Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2011 08:25:05 +0800
From: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
To: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@...ibm.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>,
Joakim Tjernlund <joakim.tjernlund@...nsmode.se>,
Bob Pearson <rpearson@...temfabricworks.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@...ger.ca>,
linux-crypto <linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
Mingming Cao <cmm@...ibm.com>, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 14/14] crc32: Select an algorithm via kconfig
On Thu, Dec 01, 2011 at 12:15:17PM -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> Allow the kernel builder to choose a crc32* algorithm for the kernel.
>
> Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@...ibm.com>
I don't like this at all. How do you expect distros or indeed
anyone to make this choice? For generic C implementations like
this we should only have one, and not many.
Cheers,
--
Email: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists