[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20111205193859.GC7137@tux1.beaverton.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2011 11:38:59 -0800
From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@...ibm.com>
To: "Ted Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>
Cc: linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/22] ext4: Only call out to crc32c if necessary
On Mon, Dec 05, 2011 at 10:52:26AM -0500, Ted Ts'o wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 03:26:43PM -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> > + /* Load the checksum driver */
> > + if (EXT4_HAS_RO_COMPAT_FEATURE(sb,
> > + EXT4_FEATURE_RO_COMPAT_METADATA_CSUM)) {
> > + sbi->s_chksum_driver = crypto_alloc_shash("crc32c", 0, 0);
> > + if (IS_ERR(sbi->s_chksum_driver)) {
> > + ret = PTR_ERR(sbi->s_chksum_driver);
> > + sbi->s_chksum_driver = NULL;
> > + goto failed_mount;
> > + }
> > + }
>
> Unless the crypto engine printk's a message if the crc32c algorithm is
> not available (perhaps even if it does), it's probably going to be a
> good idea to issue an ext4_msg() saying that we're failing because we
> couldn't load the crc32c crypto module. Otherwise the user will get a
> mysterious failure (including a message from mount to check 'dmesg |
> tail'), and then when they look at the kernel messages, they won't see
> what might have gone wrong, and then they'll send a complaint to
> ext3-users or linux-ext4....
Ok.
--D
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists