[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20111209133343.GA434@shadowen.org>
Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2011 13:33:44 +0000
From: Andy Whitcroft <apw@...onical.com>
To: Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>
Cc: Allison Henderson <achender@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Yongqiang Yang <xiaoqiangnk@...il.com>,
Ted Ts'o <tytso@....edu>, Curt Wohlgemuth <curtw@...gle.com>,
Surbhi Palande <csurbhi@...il.com>,
Rafael Wysocki <rjw@...k.pl>, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Bug with "fix partial page writes" [3.2-rc regression]
On Thu, Dec 08, 2011 at 06:12:35PM +0000, Andy Whitcroft wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 08, 2011 at 09:39:55AM -0800, Hugh Dickins wrote:
>
> [...]
> > > [PATCH 1/2] ext4: let mpage_submit_io works well when blocksize < pagesize
> > > [PATCH 2/2] ext4: let ext4_discard_partial_buffers handle pages without
> > >
> > > [PATCH 1/2] ext4: remove a wrong BUG_ON in ext4_ext_convert_to_initialized
> > > [PATCH 2/2] ext4: let ext4_bio_write_page handle EOF correctly
> [...]
> > Only once, before the fixes, did I ever see an unexplained EINVAL
> > (from cp), like Andy reports: I'm very hopeful his case is fixed too.
>
> Yes I have reverted my fix and applied all four of these patches (above).
> I have just completed a 100 iteration run of my test case without failure.
> This would typically fail in the first iteration 90% of the time and
> never survived more than two iterations.
>
> I am comfortable saying they resolve my issue.
Are we likely to see these fixes in a 3.2-rcN or will they be going to
stable?
-apw
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists