lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 12 Dec 2011 10:41:41 +0800
From:	Tao Ma <tm@....ma>
To:	Ted Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
CC:	linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ext4: Unify inode flags bit and inode flags.

On 12/12/2011 10:40 AM, Ted Ts'o wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 09:59:49AM +0800, Tao Ma wrote:
>> From: Tao Ma <boyu.mt@...bao.com>
>>
>> In order to make atomic set/get of inode flags, we create a enum of
>> different inode flags. Now when we add a new inode flag(e.g inline data),
>> we have to add both the 'enum' and the 'define' and calculate the value
>> of 'define' by ourselves. This is a bit boring and error-prune.
>> So this patch just unify these 2 fields.
> 
> This was deliberate.  The problem is these flags also have to be in
> sync with the hex values defined in include/linux/fs.h (and in some
> other file systems' header files), not to mention the definitions in
> e2fsprogs.
> 
> This is because the lsattr and chattr command was originally defined
> originally for ext2/3, but then other file systems (reiserfs, xfs,
> btrfs, etc) decided they would also use the same ioctls and userspace
> commands.  So we have partial overlap of these flags, and when we
> define new flags we have to be a little careful to make sure we
> coordinate between all of the places where these flags are defined.
> 
> So the fact that this is also an ABI is why I don't want to use an
> enum and to calculate the values from that.
Fair enough.
Thanks for the detailed explanation.

Tao
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ