lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2011 09:00:10 +0800 From: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@...el.com> To: "Li, Shaohua" <shaohua.li@...el.com> Cc: Ted Ts'o <tytso@....edu>, "linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org" <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>, NeilBrown <neilb@...e.de>, linux-raid@...r.kernel.org, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk> Subject: Re: ext4 data=writeback performs worse than data=ordered now > I found sometimes one disk hasn't any request inflight, but we can't > send request to the disk, because the scsi host's resource (the queue > depth) is used out, looks we send too many requests from other disks and > leave some disks starved. The resource imbalance in scsi isn't a new > problem, even 3.1 has such issue, so I'd think writeback introduces new > imbalance between the 12 disks. In fact, if I limit disk's queue depth > to 10, in this way the 12 disks will not impact each other in scsi > layer, the performance regression fully disappears for both writeback > and order mode. I observe similar issue in MD. The default q->nr_requests = BLKDEV_MAX_RQ; is too small for large arrays, and I end up doing echo 1280 > /sys/block/md0/queue/nr_requests in my tests. Thanks, Fengguang -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists