linux-ext4 - Re: [PATCH] update 068 to reproduce an unfreeze hanging up problem

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20120104145944.GA21381@infradead.org>
Date:	Wed, 4 Jan 2012 09:59:44 -0500
From:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To:	Masayoshi MIZUMA <m.mizuma@...fujitsu.com>
Cc:	Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
	linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, xfs@....sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] update 068 to reproduce an unfreeze hanging up problem

On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 11:22:10AM +0900, Masayoshi MIZUMA wrote:
> > test 068 will catch problems like the one your specific test
> > catches, but maybe not every time. Test 068 will catch problems your
> > test case won't, though - it's a trade-off between having lots of
> > tests that are similar but slightly different (difficult to
> > maintain, increases runtime, etc), and having one test that
> > exercises the functionality in a simple manner likely to detect
> > problems.
> 
> Thank you for your explanation about the policy and I understand it.


> I tried to reproduce the problem not dropping the sleep, but the problem was
> not reproduced... Therefore, I dropped it and the problem was reproduced.
> 
> However, as you mentioned, the problem is a timing proglem, so the
> my reproduction might be just by chance. Dropping sleep may increase
> the possibility of the reproduction, but not every time, so the change
> is not good. That is same for the arguments of fsstress which I changed.
> 
> OK, I update 068 just to run other filesystem, ext3, ext4 and btrfs which
> I confirmed xfs_freeze works on.
> (xfs_freeze may work on the other filesystems which have freeze_fs/unfreeze_fs
>  super_operations but I don't confirm...)
> 
> The patch is below.

Given that MIZUMAs patch reproduces a real life issue I think adding
his original patch in addition to this change would be a good idea.

Dave, do you have a strong opinion against that?

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html