lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20120111153125.GC4589@thunk.org> Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2012 10:31:25 -0500 From: Ted Ts'o <tytso@....edu> To: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org> Cc: Andreas Dilger <adilger@...mcloud.com>, linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org, Bernd Schubert <bernd.schubert@...m.fraunhofer.de>, ext4 development <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>, linux-fsdevel Devel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>, Fan Yong <yong.fan@...mcloud.com>, "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...hat.com>, Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...hat.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] [RESEND] 32/64 bit llseek hashes (v5) On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 09:48:27AM -0500, J. Bruce Fields wrote: > > Yes, this needs to be fixed--is there anything in particular holding up > these patches? Yes, I need more people reviewing ext4 patches, so it's not me doing all of the review. :-) I will put this on my "high priority to review ASAP for the next merge window" list. - Ted -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists