[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-id: <4F14584B.9080008@shiftmail.org>
Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2012 18:03:07 +0100
From: Asdo <asdo@...ftmail.org>
To: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@...il.com>
Cc: linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Filesystem freeze vs blockdevice snapshot
[sorry for double posting : had forgot to remove html]
Thanks but it's still not clear to me.
What do you mean with "clean fs"? is that in any way different from an
image after a sudden power loss?
Secondarily, how can LVM know what filesystem is underneath and call the
proper freeze? That's a bare block device, there might not even be a
filesystem under LVM; or it might be exported via iSCSI to an XYZ
operating system using the Xyzfs filesystem which Linux knows nothing
about...
Thank you
On 01/14/12 19:33, Amir Goldstein wrote:
> LVM2 already does the fs freeze for you before taking the snapshot.
> it's the only way to get a block device snapshot of a "clean" fs.
> hope that answers your question.
>
> On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 5:30 PM, Asdo <asdo@...ftmail.org
> <mailto:asdo@...ftmail.org>> wrote:
>
> Hello all,
> please excuse the silly question...
>
> What is the benefit of performing an ext4 fs freeze before taking
> a snapshot of the underlying block device with LVM2 ?
>
> Is the freeze step useful or I can go with the snapshot directly?
>
> And/or is there another use case for the freeze?
>
> Thank you
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe
> linux-ext4" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> <mailto:majordomo@...r.kernel.org>
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists