linux-ext4 - Re: [PATCH v2] ext4: ignore EXT4_INODE_JOURNAL

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20120119165007.GA32029@thunk.org>
Date:	Thu, 19 Jan 2012 11:50:07 -0500
From:	Ted Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
To:	Lukas Czerner <lczerner@...hat.com>
Cc:	linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ext4: ignore EXT4_INODE_JOURNAL_DATA flag with
 delalloc

On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 12:03:44PM +0100, Lukas Czerner wrote:
> +	/* We do not support data journalling with delayed allocation */
> +	if (!S_ISREG(inode->i_mode) ||
> +	   (test_opt(inode->i_sb, DATA_FLAGS) == EXT4_MOUNT_JOURNAL_DATA) ||
> +	   (ext4_test_inode_flag(inode, EXT4_INODE_JOURNAL_DATA) &&
> +	   !test_opt(inode->i_sb, DELALLOC)))
> +		return EXT4_INODE_JOURNAL_DATA_MODE;	/* journal data */

It's probably clearer to make avoid the complex boolean expression:

	if (!S_ISREG(inode->i_mode))
		return EXT4_INODE_JOURNAL_DATA_MODE;
	if (test_opt(inode->i_sb, DATA_FLAGS) == EXT4_MOUNT_JOURNAL_DATA))
		return EXT4_INODE_JOURNAL_DATA_MODE;
	if (ext4_test_inode_flag(inode, EXT4_INODE_JOURNAL_DATA) &&
	    !test_opt(inode->i_sb, DELALLOC)))
		return EXT4_INODE_JOURNAL_DATA_MODE;

You could combine the first two condiionals:

	if (!S_ISREG(inode->i_mode) ||
	    test_opt(inode->i_sb, DATA_FLAGS) == EXT4_MOUNT_JOURNAL_DATA)
		return EXT4_INODE_JOURNAL_DATA_MODE;
	if (ext4_test_inode_flag(inode, EXT4_INODE_JOURNAL_DATA) &&
	    !test_opt(inode->i_sb, DELALLOC)))
		return EXT4_INODE_JOURNAL_DATA_MODE;

... but combining || and && where someone has to squint and count
parenthesis can be error-prone.  I can look at either of the above two
and understand quickly what's going on.  With what you had (especially
since the identation of !test_opt(...) wasn't quite right, I had to
squint and think for a bit before I convince dmyself it was correct.

Otherwise, looks good!

					- Ted
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html