[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120125224847.GT15102@dastard>
Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2012 09:48:47 +1100
From: Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>
To: Robin Dong <hao.bigrat@...il.com>
Cc: Ted Ts'o <tytso@....edu>, Andreas Dilger <adilger@...ger.ca>,
Ext4 Developers List <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] Add new extent structure in ext4
On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 08:51:53PM +0800, Robin Dong wrote:
> Hi Ted, Andreas and the list,
>
> After the bigalloc-feature is completed in ext4, we could have much more
> big size of block-group (also bigger continuous space), but the extent
> structure of files now limit the extent size below 128MB, which is not
> optimal.
>
> We could solve the problem by creating a new extent format to support
> larger extent size, which looks like this:
>
> struct ext4_extent2 {
> __le64 ee_block; /* first logical block extent covers */
> __le64 ee_start; /* starting physical block */
> __le32 ee_len; /* number of blocks covered by extent */
> __le32 ee_flags; /* flags and future extension */
> };
>
> struct ext4_extent2_idx {
> __le64 ei_block; /* index covers logical blocks from 'block' */
> __le64 ei_leaf; /* pointer to the physical block of the next level */
> __le32 ei_flags; /* flags and future extension */
> __le32 ei_unused; /* padding */
> };
>
> I think we could keep the structure of ext4_extent_header and add new
> imcompat flag EXT4_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_EXTENTS2.
>
> The new extent format could support 16TB continuous space and larger volumes.
>
> What's your opinion?
Just use XFS.
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
david@...morbit.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists